MVP (Minimum Viable Product) is a topic that won’t die down in 21stC Biz Dev. I covered it – and its weaknesses earlier, but had a practical personal example this week when I launched my London FinTech Podcast
One summary of MVP theory is “you should be embarrassed by your first version” – the whole point of that methodology being to get something out there and iterate fast.
However there is a very interesting and very relevant principle in Taoism here … Continue reading →
Actually not all of them are for example the Dhara Devi in Chiang Mai is one of the best things in life and it most certainly isn’t free 😉
However an increasing number of things are. One of the best and simplest ways to accelerate your business (or personal) life and development is to leverage these. Furthermore if you don’t you risk being left behind – we live in a world that changes at the speed of light – literally as anything new gets tweeted round the world and soon copied.
There’s just one small problem – which is the tsunami of content and free stuff out there. Wading through it takes time – or a guide… Continue reading →
Darth Vader doesn’t date. Mind you, based on a poll I saw, Anakin Skywalker and Padme’s on-screen “romance” was judged the least believable ever – so Anakin barely dated either. But they – and “American style” 20thC manipulation marketing – belong in a galaxy a long time ago far, far away.
In our galaxy, here and now, different principles need to apply. In the second part of The Tao of BizDev YouTube trilogy on how Business and hence BizDev has changed in the 21stC I emphasise the importance of dating as an antidote to many of the challenges of 21stC business development.
In talking to folks subsequently it’s clear that many – or even most – agree, but few understand all the ramifications. I believe there are five main reasons why dating is vitally important (it is after all The Tao of BizDev’s second principle}: Continue reading →
I first saw Hawkind in 1978 at a gig that the local evening paper suitably described as “a weird evening”. Never mind that punk had happened – every hippy and assorted entity who lived under a stone had been drawn there as if by a tribal dog whistle.
The previous year they had written a song called micro-man, which has a key line which has only become more applicable over time:
It’s the age of the micro-man, who sees the detail and never the plan
Which is highly relevant to business development today. In this world of speciation and specialisation we are all admonished to be ever more detail focused and ever less plan focused – to drill into and live amongst the pixels. This, de facto, means less time attention and thought for the big picture.
Detail is fine and dandy – and essential in many professions, or even the arts – ever seen a ballet rehearsal?. However time and time again I see that it’s The Big Picture that makes the biggest difference. No amount of tactics will make up for strategic drift.
Last week I discussed the problems around networking. One key way into this was these two images:
Too much “networking” is of the left variety – sometimes a spark will jump across but rarely. In most cases in a few months time you have no idea who that contact is on your LinkedIn list.
On the other hand (ha!) it can take some time to get to the right image – walking hand-in-hand in the same direction. Besides, in a world of change, one rarely walks a long path parallel to any person or organisation. Furthermore in a world of overload one can simply lack the time to develop such a “hand in hand” approach.
The answer is micro-partnerships 🙂 Or for those lean startup fans a different type of “P” in “MVP”. What are they? Continue reading →
You must have had those moments when a topic bombards you from all directions. I had that recently with many different sources suddenly bombarding me on the same topic and all agreeing. Uncanny. To spare you the hassle of being besieged and having to think it through yourself here is the current best-practice, 21stC networking theory.
Let’s start by going back just over a century to a dispute between Lenin and Martov over the editorial board of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party newspaper. From tiny acorns do large oak trees grow and this widens into a split between the Bolsheviks (you’ve heard of them) and Mensheviks (finally some purpose to my history O level 😀 ). Ironically the Bolsheviks (from the Russian for “majority”) believed in a tightly knit cadre (you can see how this led quite easily to dictatorship) and the Mensheviks (“minority”) a much broader-based party.
Just in case you think I have lost the plot 😀 … fast-forwarding – do you, like the Bolsheviks, want handfuls of “party-members” actively contributing to your cause? Or like the Mensheviks hundreds, thousands of passive “party members” on LinkedIn/Facebook et al?
When I were a lad, in ‘t days of ‘t horse and cart, show grounds were epicentres of candyfloss. Yucky sticky stuff which would coat and rot your teeth in seconds. There’s probably a conspiracy theory out there that it was funded by dentists.
Fortunately in those days even a five-year old could only do candyfloss in certain places. The supply was limited.
But now we have the interweb and constant interwebbing devices we can do candyfloss at any time. And like all addictions there is a lot of denial and rationalisation associated with it. Indeed some otherwise very bright buttons have spent a lot of time explaining to me why they only do candyfloss and why there is actually no way they would – say – do meat and veg.
And this causes a problem. A problem that hits the best businesses hardest. Continue reading →
For those of you not in the loop. Ries’ (a silicon valley programmer turned manager turned director) book is based on his experience of spending 6mts and a whole bunch of funding developing a product that no-one ever downloaded. A pain I can relate to as my first gig way back was porting Unix to an ICL mainframe (when the UK had a mainframe company). Lots of work, lots of stress, huge efforts, brilliant work. And it never got used. Ever. [ICL was sold to Fujitsu]. Not long after I promptly became a Merchant Banker 😀
Ries methodology centres on having an MVP – a Minimum Viable Product – that you can put out there ASAP to at least find out if the market wants it. In the extreme case it’s a single page website which says click here for more info.
In the seminal, if dated, 1999 HBR article “Unbundling the Corporation”, Hagel and Singer declared that every company contains three different kinds of business and that in future they would unbundle. nice work for consultants if you can get it (which is probably why it’s free at McKinseys site lol) … followed only 5yrs later no doubt by them “Rebundling the Corporation” 😀
This is a nice way in (well I think so lol) to framing things in a different take. Using the first three steps in the BizDev Cascade – Value, Marketing, Sales – we can “Unbundle the Corporation” in a different way.
Starting with Marketing-driven business, I would say that the sans pareil definition of most Global American Mega Cos in the food industry – is that Marketing has become the product. When you drink Coca-Cola you are drinking a brand not benefitting from a dozen teaspoons of sugar and some chemicals. Continue reading →
Do you like being “marketed” to? Do you like Ads? Do you like being “sold” to? Do you like some guy selling you stuff?
Thought not. Me neither. So why does everyone persist with Marketing and Sales? Well the same reason everyone persists – inertia. But if “we always do what we always did” … in the 21stC we will not continue “to always get what we always got” – this is my whole point – 21stC business development needs a radically new mentality.
I believe we can all make a leap forward by taking a step back, re-examining the intent behind “marketing” and “sales”, why we resist them and how we can expand our business in a harmonious way that we flow with the Tao rather than swim against the flow. Continue reading →
Any English (or probably Brit for that matter, although the periphery always had to be better at staking its claim) of a certain age certainly has absorbed the “hide your light under a bushel” vibe. It’s just not classy to go out and “brag” is it?
Tyndale translated the Bible using “bushel” rather than bowl.
Well ironically that saying is from a parable where Jesus says that you should precisely not hide your light under a bushel (or under the bed or under a stand). Less historically at present in the 21stC world of information overload, even fellow Anglos have left their bushels behind and taken to the roof-tops with 100Watt stacks.
So what do you do? Abandon your principles and tell everyone how awesome you and your products are? Probably not. So what then? Continue reading →
I reckon about 99% of business advice is “define target, load, aim, fire”. What’s your product, what’s your market etc etc. Define it and then do it. After all it’s “sensible” isn’t it? Maybe – but life is rarely like that. Skype was an Estonian start-up working with peer-to-peer file sharing. Facebook was for Harvard. Marc Eckō practiced spray painting t-shirts in his parents garage for almost a year till he got real good at it before selling one t-shirt and ended up with a billion dollar business. Madonna started as a virgin not like one.
The yang approach to getting somewhere – scientific, engineering mentality – is to have a clear defined goal and converge everything towards that goal. That’s cool – as long as you have the right goal… Sometimes it is the best way whether it’s to land a man on the moon by the end of the decade or to get a bunch of good exam results by the time you leave school.
The yin approach is the opposite – art, evolution – nurture what you have, take the next step and then decide on the next step after that. Hmmm these two chords strummed together sound good … I wonder whether this third chord goes with it. A divergent process.
So let’s keep this post simple. The next time someone says “what do you want to be when you grow up?”, “what will your new business be?”, pause and think of this yin-yang model of development. Sometimes the yang way is best – but I would say more often yin is the way.
People who ask those kinds of questions are often folks giving training courses, or writing or reading) textbooks – not real world business folks. Real world folks know that generally things evolve – and that the reason it works this way is that if we co-evolve our ideas in the world we co-evolve something that folks will buy and which has been co-designed by the market. Sometimes you can get away with “inventing something in a dark room” and then selling it – but not as often as anyone tells you. And even then it’s a tough sell.
How Yin or Yang is your Business Development approach? Which way has worked best for you?
I never had any interest in all the hysterical articles on Bitcoin until I read this non-hysterical one by Marc Andressen who wrote the first web browser, co-founded Netscape and now is investing in Bitcoin-related businesses. Nor have I ever used a post to summarise someone else’s content. However rules are made to be broken 🙂
I have been tangentially interested in Bitcoin only as the first crack in governments’ control over money (and in seeing governments do everything they can to prevent and ‘diss it). So much attention is placed on economic monopolies but we seem to be stuck with political monopolies [“one party/two brand” systems] and currency monopolies controlled by said political monopoly (or arguably by the civil service monopolies which in practice control the politicians more than vice versa). Screaming Lord Sutch, erstwhile leader of the Monster Raving Loony party put it well when he asked why there is only one Monopolies Commission. He should have taken his argument much further 🙂 Here are some snips to whet your appetite from the NYTimes article… Continue reading →
I am sure you have noticed how the number of books have gone up in your lifetime. How the number of webpages explodes along with emails, blogs to read, podcasts, YouTubes, and links to cute kittens.
Mark Schaefer Grow Blog
Exponentially increasing content, a limit to eyeball hours in the day and naturally it gets less valuable. Coupled with the fact that in this world of instant sharing how much is genuinely new?
Of course strong rebuttals. A buddy who is an expert in government website content sent me (when I mentioned the phrase “another snowflake in the content blizzard”) a link denying all of this. It was written by “The Content Marketing Association” (and had little real logic). No shit Sherlock the X institute says X is no way getting less important to the world 🙂
It’s a good excuse to recap the whole picture and let you know my take… Continue reading →
Hacking is back in fashion. I met real hackers in the Computer Science Dept at Cambridge in the very early 80s – the leftovers from the hippy days of computing. There was one guy who was an ace hacker who was the type that didn’t wear shoes, hair down to the waist and – as I memorably read the genus described as once – “equate altruism with not washing” 🙂 But a real genius who could do cool things.
And years on the spirit is back. This time with good grooming 🙂
This one has been on my mind for a while – I’m not quite sure about it [Are you allowed to say that in a blog? Surely you should present absolute certainty! Ed]. It’s certainly the business/economic koan for the C21st. What do you think?
Marsh Ruby is a great cafe/restaurant in Lower Marsh near Waterloo station in London. They do:
Fresh & healthy, home cooked Indian food. Served fast!
Sign in Marsh Ruby
… so they have sussed out the need for a “tweetable” encapsulation of their product/service 🙂 And it is really fresh and un-oily and unlike almost all Indian food in this country. People like it who “don’t like Indian food”.
This is a great one. Well it would be great if it was accurate lol – the actual quote (from George Box) is “all models…”. Unless Hugh MacLeod (aka gaping void) was using recursion by misstating the quote 🙂
It’s very Taoist. … the ungraspability, the undefinability of reality … the pragmatism about whatever works works … until it doesn’t. The opposite of Confucian certainties about right and wrong. The opposite of the West’s current love affair with ludicrously complex laws, regulation and bureaucracy.
Last week I wrote about wu-wei and the perfect presentation. Now let’s go the whole hog and consider profound non-doing/effortless-doing/natural-doing and marketing as a whole. What’s better than Marketing? No Marketing!
And I joke not. Gazillion dollar start-ups such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, AirBnB and Dropbox grew without marketing budgets worth mentioning. I saw some linkbait today about getting 10,000 hits a day without marketing. Growth hacking (well it does come from California lol) is all the rage. What can we learn from it?
I resisted this for a long time. I resisted the “Twitter-isation” of society. So how come I gave in? Why do I now think it’s vital? Why is it the next 21stC BizDev step which must come after the all-important Value Mining and Refining?
In the post on Strings of Pearls and Sausage Machines I wrote about the development from a “one by one”, ad hoc, approach to getting new deals (individually or corporately) to a process-driven, works-every-day approach.
But what happens when it goes the other way? What happens when the gaps between pearls get bigger and the pearls get smaller? What happens when you can’t find any pearls but can only get a piece of cheap glass? What happens when you stop being a pearl diver and just become a scrap collector?
I blame it on schools. Although that’s not fair as they are just passing on cultural biases. In more expansive mode I blame it on the Age of Reason. And if pushed I blame it on Plato.
The blame for what? For “right-answer-ism”. We are conditioned and conditioned and conditioned at the formative stages of our brain development into there being a “right answer”. Especially in these days of national curricula and marking schemes “the right answer” is embedded in the whole results process. Hard to escape.
The problem is that in life, in business, if there is a “right answer” it’s one that’s always changing. This Taoist symbol is perhaps the most famous in the world – people have seen it who have never heard of Taoists or The Tao:
Here we have constant change as the central emblem (yin and yang are always in motion – the pic is a snapshot). Which leads us on to headless chickens.. Continue reading →
I never used to rehearse for my investment management pitches. Mind you I never rehearsed for my wedding speech either nor some best-man’s speeches – I just winged it. I must have been crazy 🙂 … well either that or more testosterone back then lol. Kind of “dangerous sports” mentality applied to everyday life. Except … I did do much better than the equities guys who rehearsed and rehearsed and were tutored and coached.
There can be many factors here but one of them is the very Taoist vibe of spontaneity and appropriateness to the moment:
“When one has reached maturity in the (martial) art, one will have a formless form. It is like ice dissolving in water. When one has no form, one can be all forms; when one has no style, he can fit in with any style.”
Let’s take the smallest SmallCo – you! Chances are your career has been rather like a string of pearls … one after another string along a necklace with some gaps. However where do you get your next pearl from? In the worst case its tough diving around trying to find those oysters and prying them open.
NewCos and often SmallCos operate the same way. We need that first flagship deal! OK got it … now we need a second … hmm hang on they want something rather different etc etc, NewCos and SmallCos can be stuck in pearl territory for a long time, and like most traps, the strongest trap is one you don’t even know you are in. Continue reading →
I learned this lesson the hard way. You know, as in sticking your hand in the fire and finding out that fire burns and not only that it really hurts. Anyway like all lessons learned the hard way (as opposed to read amongst a million other surfs on the net) it is never forgotten.
It’s simple to explain, easy to remember (if you think of keys and locks) but hard to strike the dynamic balance in practice – the Tao is not a fixed thing – this isn’t some western “right answer” thing … more like surfing when you have to decide there and then where the balance is.
Supply-push is when you design something and then try to sell it. It’s like designing a key.
Demand-pull is when you find out what is required and then design it. It’s like working out what key is required when you know what the lock is like.
This is a huuuuge rift between two tectonic plates in BizDev. Which way round you are is perhaps the most important factor in determining BizDev ease of success. Let’s go over why… Continue reading →
The Tao – or the way things are – is like a river. Sometimes flowing this way, sometimes that. Sometimes slow, sometimes fast. Sometimes gently, sometimes turbulently. The connection to our business/personal development is clear. Sometimes business goes smoothly, sometimes our career goes smoothly. At other times the whole show can go over the edge of a waterfall (cue pretty pic :-))
So what to do about this? How to go beyond trite metaphor to practical application? Continue reading →
Mitch (a marketing/journalist/publicist and uber-interwebby person) must have loved it when Marketing Magazine dubbed him the “Rock Star of Digital Marketing”. It’s a great by-line and he did work as a rock journalist for a long time and you don’t want to start listening to a conversation between Mitch and Seth on “vinyl” 🙂 Instead you can watch and listen to Seth Godin interview Mitch about the new book and take questions in an event hosted by Google no less:
Mitch is one of my three “must follows” – as in even when I don’t have time and fall behind I will catch up on his material in his blog and great (if a bit “marketing/pr industry” detailed) podcast. You can check out the book in all the usual places. My aim here is not to add another precis to the internet. Rather I want to draw out some key themes in the context of this blog. Continue reading →